Village Government Management in Human Resource Development of Kerendan Village of Lahei Subdistrict of Barito Utara District of Central Kalimantan, the Republic of Indonesia

×

Error message

User warning: The following theme is missing from the file system: journalijdr. For information about how to fix this, see the documentation page. in _drupal_trigger_error_with_delayed_logging() (line 1138 of /home2/journalijdr/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

International Journal of Development Research

Volume: 
09
Article ID: 
16043
4 pages
Research Article

Village Government Management in Human Resource Development of Kerendan Village of Lahei Subdistrict of Barito Utara District of Central Kalimantan, the Republic of Indonesia

Elsa Mentari

Abstract: 

Article 74 of the Act Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Company reads that companies that operate their business in the area of and/or related to natural resources are required to accomplish their social and environmental responsibilities and should allocate and calculate the necessary cost thereof in their budged. Additionally, village government’s limited finance for development in various sectors is one of the reasons why the role and the cooperation between the government and the companies should be established through village government management in human resource development. The methods used in the study are descriptive and qualitative ones. Data are collected using in-depth interview, intensive observation, documentation, and literature study. The data are analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive data analysis. The results of the study show that the village government management in the human resource development has been well-implemented in terms of planning and organizing government resources. However, the results have not been maximal because of the lack of the control and the follow-up of the village government of Karendan village and its partners. The obstacles relate to budgetary issues and the less effective communication and coordination among institutions, while geographical location significantly influences the acceleration of program implementation.

Download PDF: