Receiving the right political system for afghanistan

×

Error message

User warning: The following theme is missing from the file system: journalijdr. For information about how to fix this, see the documentation page. in _drupal_trigger_error_with_delayed_logging() (line 1138 of /home2/journalijdr/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

International Journal of Development Research

Volume: 
13
Article ID: 
27049
8 pages
Research Article

Receiving the right political system for afghanistan

Farahuddin Chaghaty

Abstract: 

This research, which has focused on finding a suitable political system for Afghanistan, has described discussions such as (explaining the concept of political system and structure, parliamentary system, advantages and disadvantages of parliamentary system, presidential system, advantages and disadvantages of parliamentary system and criticism of the current political system of Afghanistan). At the beginning of the research, we will get acquainted with the familiar discussion of the political system and structure, the comparison of the parliamentary system and the presidential system. In the era of globalization, countries experienced different systems from the centralized presidential system to the decentralized federal system, which in their nature have opponents and but the case and goal we are looking for is to get the right system, most of the scientists and writers expressed their opinion that the parliamentary system was more efficient in most of the countries that are transitioning towards modern democracy, compared to the centralized presidential system. End and the result that magnifies the current research is that the parliamentary system and the presidential system each have their own positive and negative points (advantages and shortcomings) that both of these systems are now clearly experienced in most countries of the world, which is a good example. The presidential system can be seen in the United States and a good example of the parliamentary system can be seen in the British political structure. But! The experiences gained from the experience of the parliamentary system in the majority of countries indicate that a non-centralized parliamentary system can be a good answer in the discussion of good governance and the experience of modern democracy in multi-ethnic and multi-racial societies like Afghanistan. According to the theory of separation of powers, the parliamentary system has better flexibility than the presidential system, which can prevent the tension between the two main branches of government (legislature, executive) and bring stability to most societies.

DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.27049.08.2023
Download PDF: