Effects of submaximal test on heart rate recovery in hypertensive patients
International Journal of Development Research
Effects of submaximal test on heart rate recovery in hypertensive patients
Received 24th May, 2026 Received in revised form 20th June, 2026 Accepted 18th July, 2026 Published online 31st August, 2026
Copyright©2026, Muhammed Nauman Kazi and Tinkalben Navinbhai Patel. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background: Hypertension is associated with impaired regulation of the autonomic nervous system, resulting in altered cardiovascular responses during and after physical activity. Heart rate recovery (HRR) following exercise is a simple, non-invasive, and reliable indicator of autonomic function and cardiovascular health. Delayed HRR is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive individuals. Post-exercise recovery position may influence venous return, autonomic reactivation, and the speed of heart rate normalization; however, limited evidence exists regarding the most effective recovery posture following submaximal exercise in hypertensive patients. Aim: This study sought to determine the most effective recovery position for optimizing cardiovascular recovery in hypertensive individuals, supporting improved hypertension management strategies. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 36 hypertensive patients aged 30–60 years. Participants performed the Queen College Step Test, and heart rate was measured immediately post-exercise and during recovery at 1, 5, and 10 minutes across three recovery positions—supine, trunk-forward leaning, and standing—assigned in a randomized, counterbalanced manner. Repeated-measures ANOVA (jamovi) compared heart rate recovery across positions and time intervals. Result: A significant effect of time on heart rate was found (p < 0.001), but no significant between-group effect (p = 0.647). A significant time × group interaction (p = 0.015) indicated differing recovery patterns across groups. Heart rate reductions from immediate post-exercise to 1 and 5 minutes were significant (p < 0.001), with near-complete recovery by 10 minutes. Trunk-forward leaning showed comparatively faster recovery. Conclusion: Body position during recovery influences HRR pattern and rate in hypertensive patients. Heart rate remained elevated at 1 and 5 minutes across groups, indicating delayed autonomic recovery. Trunk-forward leaning showed the fastest early decline, supine approached near-complete recovery by 10 minutes, and standing was slowest, suggesting recovery posture affects cardiovascular recovery post-exercise.