Economic comparative analysis between latticed unidirectionial and pre-manufactured solid slabs in a four-storey building
International Journal of Development Research
Economic comparative analysis between latticed unidirectionial and pre-manufactured solid slabs in a four-storey building
Received 21st July, 2018; Received in revised form 23rd August, 2018; Accepted 17th September, 2018; Published online 29th October, 2018
Copyright © 2018, Nilton Meira Correia Neto and Débora Valim Sinay Neves. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The article aims at comparative cost analysis between two structural systems in reinforced concrete, one using solid slabs as flat elements and the other using unidirectional prefabricated ribbed slab with lattice beams. For accomplishment of case study, two structural projects of a four-storey building have been elaborated, one project being used solid slab and the other latticed prefabricated slab, taking into account all aspects of structural performance of two types of slab, making the sizing of all structural elements to be built in the most economical way possible, considering NBR 6118/2014, and among those structural elements was disregarded the calculation of foundation, because there is variable factor of soil . The results have been obtained through design of slabs, beams and pillars of the project, and subsequently a quantitative survey of materials and inputs. Through quantitative survey, a budget of two systems has been made based on unit price compositions of SINAPI (National System of Costs Survey and Civil Construction Indexes), as well as unit price references of the same. In that way, it was possible to compare two budgets related to structural systems in reinforced concrete, using solid slabs and unidirectional prefabricated ribbed slabs with lattice beams, reaching the result that differentiates cost between the two systems.