Clinical evaluation of three different retrograde filling material (mta, bioceramic, biodentine) after apicoectomy utilizing cone beam computed tomography

×

Error message

User warning: The following theme is missing from the file system: journalijdr. For information about how to fix this, see the documentation page. in _drupal_trigger_error_with_delayed_logging() (line 1138 of /home2/journalijdr/public_html/includes/bootstrap.inc).

International Journal of Development Research

Clinical evaluation of three different retrograde filling material (mta, bioceramic, biodentine) after apicoectomy utilizing cone beam computed tomography

Abstract: 

Aim: The purpose of this In Vivo study is to compare the three different retrograde filling materials following endodontic surgery by using CBCT.
Materials and Methods: In our study, patients with periapical lesion were selected irrespective of site, age and sex. After incision, flap elevation was done. Osteotomy was performed using no. 4 carbide bur, to gain access to the apical region. Apicoectomy was performed followed by retrograde filling with three different materials. Nova bone putty was used as a bone graft material at the lesion site. The flaps were then sutured .Preoperative and postoperative CBCT was done to determine the size of radiolucent area or the periapical lesion.
Results: Bioceramic showed maximum decrease in size of the lesion, followed by Biodentine and MTA.
Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, Bioceramic surpassed the rest as a retrograde filling material.
 

Download PDF: